When someone posts a thread regarding traffic infringements, they often get back many responses from other members offering "advice".
In theory, Australia has a "Uniform Traffic Code", introduced some years ago to ensure uniformity of traffic laws between all the States.
1. Australia is in reality a nation of 'sovereign states'; with territories. (I am not one give additional power to Canberra).
2. The Australian road rules are not adopted in total by all states, as some states maintain 'similar' regulations that for all intents and purpose, may or may not be 'the same' as an ARR. Example; ARR 217 (front and rear fogs) is not used in NSW, because we maintain our own regulation on the matter. Some jurisdictions do NOT accept the ARR default speed limits, NT is an example.
Australia IS a contracting party to the United Nations Convention on Road Traffic, SO our BASIC "rules of the road" ARE THE SAME; keep left, keep left multi-lane; indicator use, line markings and obeyance etc and so on. Means our basic rules of the road are the SAME as most places on earth.
NSW has mountains of additional_to_ARR regulations and Acts of parliament that directly impact our driving lives. Sometimes other legislation OUTSIDE "cars and roads" also impacts on how we drive, and can determine legal outcome in court. A very simple obvious example is EPA legislation.
3. Traffic penalties (fine amounts, jail) and demerits are and will remain state issues.
4. By in large, "the graduated licensing systems" are harmonising, but differences remain as to license categories and conditions of license, and how they are set out; one jurisdiction might have two L plate levels, the others a single L period, etc and so on.
However, if there is one area where the States cannot agree, it's traffic penalties and procedures for dealing with appeals, license suspension and cancellations. To put it simply, no two States seem to do the same thing and the way certain matters are handled can be totally different.
Yep. I can signal NSW will *not* enter into 'arrangements' with Canberra or other jurisdictions as to what we charge for penalties and outcome. Sometimes an offence carried in one state CAN reflect on a NSW license, say in points IF we in turn also apply a penalty for the offence.
Many of the posts offered as "advice" are misplaced, simply because the poster lives in a different State to the OP. I often see advice given which is completely wrong and misleading, but if offered in such a way as to suggest that "it is right because it happened to me" (or a mate).
Quite right. That sooo many post 'blindly', is more ignorance of the reality - of just what Australia 'is'.
Your cautious warning is appropriate, OP's should mention the state in question, but many are young and don't understand any of that, such things are not taught, I presume, in Skoolz.
Another respondent warns of the danger of accepting forum-based legal advice, also appropriate. People should only accept advice as a guideline. For serious matters, see a solicitor in your state.
OP's should mention the jurisdiction they question, saves others asking 'what state or territory'?
Good post OP.
I was thinking just the other day of raising the NSW Light Horse Regiment again, I'd use it to invade The Peoples Republic of Victoria