actually a lot of people are talking about that problem and they are actively working on solutions.
the best solution to this problem is the change of battery technology and it is being worked on worldwide so in 20 years most evs might not even contain a lithium battery, time will tell.
they are even developing fire suppression techniques like
f-500 ea could be used on a large scale system in that basement to automatically suppress the fire or some other new technology.
maybe an onboard suppression system could be developed using f-500 directly into the battery box.
it is honestly no different to any other developing technology, there will be risks and innovations to mitigate those risks, but this whole fear campaign is being funded and driven by the people that stand to lose the most out of this transition.
as much as i think he is a bit of a wanker elon and tesla have pushed the technology into the main stream so people will start working on it because there is a market now to profit from and that will lead to innovation like every other technology.
as for the felicity ace the press sure like to push vague articles that contain a lot of speculation or just leave out parts like the ship running aground causing it to take on water and sink you then have the reports of 4000 evs onboard when there were only about 300 and the speculation that an ev started it but that was not confirmed but it makes a better headline.
no one mentioned that over 60 other vessels were totally lost by fire in the last 5 years or that
800+ vessels were reported as total loss in the last 10 years.
its not even the only vessel carrying vehicles that has caught fire and sunk in the last decade but they didnt make news because an ev was not listed on the cargo manifest
but because 1 ship had 300 evs it made news like it has never happened before and the focal part was ev and not the 3700 ice vehicles or the fact that this type of maritime incident happens a lot more than you think.