I’d keep lift, LSA, more advance, go for same IVO earlier IVC say 66° (more useful torque).
I’d get tired of the big EVC fuming up and causing troubles, no need for that overlap.
I hear what you’re saying but it's one of those areas where if you get a bunch of tuners together talking about IVO, IVC and EVC you’ll get many different opinions and preferences and at the end of the day it comes down to what the owner is really trying to achieve.
I don’t street race from traffic lights or that type of thing, so as much as I love low down torque which I have in some of my cars it’s not totally important to me when adding power as I’ll usually get it to some extent anyway and if it comes in stronger at a higher RPM then that’s better if I was to ever use it at a track.
I have noticeable cams in some of my injected and carbie cars and even though they may have a rough idle and spit some fuel, I don’t really have any of the fume problems that seem to be described here.
How you tune the vehicle does play a big part in sorting these problems and bigger cams though not for everyone aren’t the evil thing some people think them to be.
As you’d know a good tuner can work magic if they’re experienced or prepare to put in the time.
I guess what I was trying to say is I like to be noticed and I’m happy to live with some of the little inconveniences a bigger cam brings as I no longer use the low down power of a small cam on the street when I know the bigger one also offers an increase in low torque as well.
I also consider the cam being discussed as a small cam and something around a 23x/23x as a small to medium.
.