I am Quoting from an Article in an automotive magazine, the article was published just after the laws were passed in NSW to ban high powered cars
Its a bit of a read but i think people how are passionate about this topic will find in very interesting
Let me spell it out to the activists, it isnt the type of car thats doing the killing, its the drivers behind the wheel. A Toyota Echo or a Daewoo Lanos can easily reach speeds of 150 kmph, meaning that if someone wants to drive fast, they will drive fast in whatever they get their hands on.
Heres an interesting thought, imagine doing 150kmph in a Holden Barina and doing the same speed in a Skyline GTR. The Skyline has more appropriate bump and rebound rates, up-rated swaybars, stiffer chassis, lower roll centre. Which would be the safer of the two cars?
Think of the two cars that newspapers want young drivers to be in - Standard Lancers & Accents. Theres nothing wrong with these cars, but the irony is that the media is recommending cars that put dirvers more at risk. All of these examples were rated in an independant test as providing below average occupant safety in the event of a crash. Yet the Stereotypical "Hoon" cars, the S15 200 SX, Subaru WRX, Holden SS Commodore, etc, all recieved better than average scores!!!
The Vehicle Restrictions also do not take into account the passive safety of performance models. Think about this example. Take a P Plater in a standard used & therefore affordable WRX Impreza. Take the same driver in their parents company car, most likely a newish Falcon or Holden Commodore. Under extreme turning forces, like those needed in an emergency situation, it would be the commodore that would be the most dangerous car for a young driver to be in, it boasts more power, doesnt have all wheel drive traction and is less nimble thanks to heavier mass and greater inertia. The commodore only recently has been equipped with ABS & traction control where as the WRX had these safety feature from its debut in 1994!
Newspapers decribe new and powerful road cars as "dangerous weapons" yet flick over to the motoring section of that same newspaper and they are being described as having exceptional "grip & safety"