- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
- Messages
- 22,633
- Reaction score
- 20,525
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Sth Auck, NZ
- Members Ride
- HSV VS Senator, VX Calais II L67
the simplest way to describe a high stall converter is to compare it to the old manual setup. it's basically like revving the engine higher before letting the clutch out. example, the standard converter stalls about 1800rpm, so it's like a clutch thats engaged but slips until it hits 1800rpm, fitting the high stall, lets say 2500rpm you let the clutch out much later and it doesn't lock up untill 2500rpm. the down side of a high stall is that you loose some engine responce down low in the rev range unless you give it a bootfull when you take off and therefor you will loose some fuel economy cause when your cruizing and the converter hasn't reached it's stall point some of the power produced by the engine is lost in converter slippage which brings me to the other problem with high stall converters which is the extra heat they create, when the converter slips it created a lot of heat which is a sure fire way to an early transmition failure so a bigger/better trans cooler will be needed. high stall converters are good for drag racing but not really required untill you start fitting much bigger cams with lots of duration which don't make lots of grunt untill higher in the rev range and therefor a high stall is required otherwise the engine will bogg of the line etc your probably better of fitting a better cam first etc
edit: not exactly sure about the torque curve of the VP V6 but i know the VN s1 V6 makes about 90% of available torque from 1200rpm so there would be no need to fit a high stall for an engine like this
edit: not exactly sure about the torque curve of the VP V6 but i know the VN s1 V6 makes about 90% of available torque from 1200rpm so there would be no need to fit a high stall for an engine like this