independent professional reviewer's
I don't know that a guy with a YouTube channel can automatically be classed as professional or independent. But for the sake of argument assume he is.
is the professional driver and team at Ignition didn't turn the knob to Track before setting up the metrics?
Who knows what setting. They don't say. They also don't say how much fuel they had on board, temperature, age of the vehicles, tyre age etc. etc. etc. A one off run around a track says nothing unless you have all of the variables.
Without any kind of controlled comparisons it is all a bit meaningless.
Logically, if the MRC can be set at the same setting (FE3) and go beyond that to a stiffer setting then the track times will be quicker.
Car and driver magazine (December 2014) rates the 2015 Chev SS as quicker than the 2014 and their 2017 model test rates it quicker again. Nether though do track times but then any time is largely irrelevant unless they are tested on the same day under exactly the same conditions.
None of the tests state which MRC mode was used, how the car is tuned for the US market and of course none of them have the different subframe suspension set-up of the MSE.
Because the MRC is totally different to a normal shock absorber, like digital versus analogue.
I think that is a big leap in comparisons. Functionally a shock absorber is a shock absorber. How is it totally different?