panhead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2016
- Messages
- 3,158
- Reaction score
- 4,508
- Points
- 113
- Location
- NSW Central Coast
- Members Ride
- Cars
Anything that increases tax and otherwise reduces postive cashflow to offshore investors will make Australia even less attractive as a place to conduct value add business (e.g. MV manufacturing,) than it already is. We need more inward investment, not less. Why shouldn't an o/s owner benefit from Govt policy? E.g R&D tax offsets (aka fed govt grants - a rose by any other name). Whether direct or indirect, govt spend to boost the economy, create jobs, and increase foreign investment is critical to the economic sustainability of our island nation. Without it, we are limited to exporting low value add raw materials and (given our hemorrhaging manufacturung industry), importing most goods, and a large amount of services. Thus an ever increasing current account deficit....
Raping foreign owned companies with higher taxes is not part of the solution. Rather, it's a bit part of the problem.
A local manufacturer who is completing in an aggressive market against well priced imports has no chance of survival without the type of help you've outlined.
If that manufacturer also contributes to the on flow of many other small local industries and provides employment which in turn stimulates other markets then the taxpayer gets good value for money.
It may not be a perfect system but it has benefits and the loss of a vehicle manufacturing industry due to a lack of government input is poor government in my books.
The country is limited by its reliance on natural resources and if the world changes away from them then Australia is literally f'ed.
I'm all for you need to be competitive to survive but if the market isn't a level playing field which global vehicle manufacturing isn't then government stimulation is required.
It's then the manufacturers responsibility to ensure they get a product to market that the consumer wants.
.