Jesterarts
Your freedom ends where mine begins
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2005
- Messages
- 3,817
- Reaction score
- 105
- Points
- 48
- Age
- 38
- Location
- Victoria
- Members Ride
- 2010 Nissan X-Trail ST-L
And that's your opinion seems like you can't hack someone who doesn't agree with you. Ill give my house away if you can get two ss commodores one with a 3" one with a 2.5" and get anyone on the planet to notice a deference... my point is going 4-1 headers 200 cpi cats and 3" exhaust gave me amazing results. And it's Walkinshaw / .HM. don't bother bitching to me about Walkinshaw I really couldn't give a rat's.
Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk 2
Happy to tee this up. My "anyone" will be a dyno operator.
I have to admit, I am bored and I did some JCC stalking.
SO, turns out you had a twin 2.5 system with tri-y headers and stock cat and then went to 4-1 headers, high flow cats and a twin 3" xforce. Then apparently you changed the xforce to a HM system. But I couldn't find mention of this until now.
Anyway, in this thread you have been suggesting that the twin 3" system is what livened up your car. I say it was the high flow cats, being that cats are quite potentially the BIGGEST restriction on any exhaust system.
Anyway, I agree that my post is an opinion (I actually said that in my first post). The difference is my opinion is supported by research and lots of material you can access via google while you opinion is supported by spelling mistakes and ludacris insinuations that I think people whould run 1" exhaust systems.
Moral of the story, the OP asked if he will need to retune after he puts on a twin 3" or if there will be any benefit.
The answer remains the same as in my first post.
Required = no
Benefitial = maybe, depends on what the car has done to it already.