Not saying the dealers shouldn't be peeved, just saying that the gist of the article is typical of Josh Dowling. A 5 year term on a dealer service agreement does not (necessarily) equate to only 5 years of support from GM. For me, it means that after 5 years, they will review agreements, with probably less dealers being required before offering fresh 5 year agreements.
It makes sense that in 5 years time, there will be less Holdens on the road, so less service agents required.
Understand what you are saying but since many dealers are independent of each other, presumably their existing contracts would have been signed at differing times as they entered the industry and therefore ending at differing times (be they 5 year contracts).
GM/Holden should honour their current contracts but if they want to terminate them, then they should abide by the terms and abide by the clauses. But they seem to be wanting to bundle the contract termination with new contract negotiation... sounds a lot like a “I want to do a deal for you” salesman’s pitch which we all know is code for “I want to screw you”.
GM wanting all contract terms to line up with the same contact end dates can only be for later leverage issues so they can again bully the dealers and screw them over...
The issue of how our cars will be maintained is somewhat seperate to the business issues between dealers and a bully of a US Corp.
As a Holden Motorsports owner, I absolutely don’t feel confident that any injector issues or other poorly designed or built components will be addressed under warranty as they were for some owners even few months ago...
If GM is screwing Holden dealers, we owners are next in line