Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.

New Posts Contact us

Just Commodores Forum Community

It takes just a moment to join our fantastic community

Register

Simulated VN VP VR, V6's

88GreenVN

Next Exit Left
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
6,795
Reaction score
136
Points
63
Age
60
Location
Surprise, Arizona
Members Ride
Dodge Ram Van 1500 5.2 V8
Sounds like fun stuff to do. Good work.
 

holden007

VRII
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
Messages
1,104
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Members Ride
Subaru Liberty
No these are good VR results, not the 9.3 secs claimed by wheels magazine.
 

greenfoam

New Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
7,902
Reaction score
128
Points
0
Age
102
Members Ride
VP Executive R-spec
Ah yeah no chance a VR will do 9.3 to 100 I doubt even a V6 Calais would be that slow, but remember 60 mph takes about .3 less than to 100 km/h. In fact I've driven a VR V6 Calais with my foot on the floor and it was pretty quick !:)

My VN Lexcen (50?kgs heavier than an executive) runs 7.15 0-60mph all day with the stock chip and a CAI on it and can just crack it for a 6 with more spark advance. Macks VN executive used to do 7.3 stock but it's in Queensland with not so favourable weather conditions like I have down here in the deep south so I'd be up a fair bit on power just because of location. But both those cars seem to be close to their best possible time. A VS executive should be _slightly_ faster than all of the above cars or at least equal to them
 

holden007

VRII
Joined
Dec 18, 2003
Messages
1,104
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Members Ride
Subaru Liberty
greenfoam

You did a good favour for VR owners, I dont care if we are the slowest or fastest, but 9.3 secs, just crap. Thanks:)
 

Full Spectrum

Bro it's a VW your Audi!
Joined
Dec 6, 2003
Messages
2,411
Reaction score
16
Points
0
Location
Melbourne
Website
www.news.com.au
Members Ride
Berlina V6
greenfoam said:
Slickholden, I don't like to be the bringer of bad news but there's a very good chance your car would be no faster than stock (or even slower) once it has warmed up with the pod on it, just +15c worth of hot air could cost you 7nm of torque right through the rev range and that's most likely more than you gained back with the exhaust. Throw the pod to the tip :thumbsup: and get the coldest air into the thing you can and then go to repco or somewhere and get a cooler thermostat, around 175F or even a bit less than that AND make sure your throttle body does open 100% straight, those are things you can do that WILL make you car go faster and they are cheap.

:driving:

Worth a mention that all those calculated times are with a perfect air fuel ratio, something alot of stock VN's don't have anymore or never did have. That's why the perfect spark advance times aren't much different, because you gain most of your extra memcal power with the fuel ratio getting fixed, if that's allready ok you don't see much gain on the V6's (esp on the VN which is almost maxed out from the factory (but also most likely to have a crap air fuel ratio:)))
I stuck back the Air box today, Slower take off i can feel that:(, But mid range power is wheel spinning. But the best thing was it's been a touch ruffer with the pod and as soon as the old Air box went on the idle everything went better.
I did a sneaky i added a tiny bit of hose where the gap is in the front of the Air Box to between the light and radiator to hopefully trap some colder air up it. I could feel the sucking at my hand very easy.
 
Top