VP V6 sedan, live axle: F:27mm (prob. VN too)
VL-VR sedan, live axle: R:19mm
VB-VK sedan, (live axle): R:12mm
I have a vague recollection that ALL VN V8 were/are FE2.
A 1mm difference in 'bar dia. is significant.
Theory:
For a bar in torsion, angular deflection is:
theta = TxL/(GxJ)
where:
theta is angular deflection (twist)
T = torque applied (twisting force; force x distance at which it is applied)
L = bar length
G = Young's modulus ("spring" stiffness for the material. Steels are around 200GPa)
J = moment of inertia of cross sectional area of bar (a function of shape/size)
For an ARB, G = a material property, so doesn't change with size, and L is fixed by the suspension designer, so the relationship between T and theta is determined by 'J' which is a function of the fourth power of dia. for a circular cross section. The 'arms' of the bar will bend too but not so much as the deflection due to twist and that is also a (different) fourth power function anway.
Reverting to the VB-VL style front links and 'bar may (will?) change the lever arm length and hence the 'bar stiffness, by altering T and if it is shorter (I think it is), L. It will also add inner lower control arm bush deflections to the 'bar deflection, which was the reason for moving the 'bar links in the first place. Custom links (using steering rack tie rods
) was a quite common pre-VN aftermarket mod. to increase ARB response/stiffness.
Practice:
A 20mm 'bar is (20^4)/(19^4) = 1.23 times stiffer than a 19mm 'bar. Note that this is just the 'bar stiffness. Spring stiffness and that due to roll centre height/track width needs to be added to determine total roll stiffness. A stiffer rear bar will increase oversteer, a stiffer front bar may increase understeer but is complicated by altering suspension travel, hence geometry. (A live axle car doesn't have the quite the same geometry effects at the rear).