The Liberty, among others, comes in at the same price range and for (occasionally) carrying four people, two of whom are less than full adult size, it does the job. I wouldn't even suggest it if the VE was the same size as VZ or even better, VS. It just isn't nice to drive a car that big in traffic or park it, regardless of any greater interior space or how effectively the suspension engineers have done their job.
Point taken over towing capability but it isn't relevant for everyone (most people?).
To me, one of the advantages of the Commodore over the Falcon has always been that it was slightly smaller and significantly lighter. That has progessively been reduced from VB-VL to VN-VS to VT-VZ and is gone with VE, so looking at smaller options becomes valid. Throw in significantly better retained value for the Liberty and it looks even better. Crash safety, if that is a priority, is good for Liberty both in real world and in the lab. crash tests, so that isn't an arguement for increased size.
Currently, the Falcon seems better than VE to me, not least because I can't get past the odd proportions of VE and that the front of the car appears to belong to a different car than the rear.
I understand that export markets and where VE fits into GM globally influenced the decision to go larger but still... The possibility of a smaller rear drive Holden (still better than front drive even with all the electronics, just less so), similar to the Torana show car, as mentioned in the Wheels Billion Dollar Baby mag sounds good, esp. if a LS2 can be squeezed in
.