Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.
VF1 Tune MAF vs MAFless
- Thread starter Steveaa
- Start date
Reaper
Tells it like it is.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2004
- Messages
- 6,494
- Reaction score
- 11,714
- Points
- 113
- Location
- SE Suburbs, Melbourne
- Members Ride
- RG Z71 Colorado, 120 Prado , VDJ200, Vantage
The only reason to go mafless on a VF is if the cam is so big it fks up your intake pressures.
2INIL8
Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2009
- Messages
- 151
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 18
- Age
- 43
- Members Ride
- VH COMMODORE 308
You get reversion with bigger cams but that's only one reason.
The maf is less responsive due to the distance from throttle body as it measures air flow where map is instant.
Mafless tune is better wether stock or modified its way more responsive and just goes better.
I tune these so its not just because some other person said so its from experience.
The one issue is fueling is a lot harder to get right but if the tuner knows their ****
it wont be an issue.
People keep saying keep the maf on a stock engine but cant say exactly why.
Some tuners keep the maf as its just easier in comparison to re mapping the virtual ve table.
Then there are other fueling tables that come into play like PE and dynamics.
Maf is just easier for them.
The maf is less responsive due to the distance from throttle body as it measures air flow where map is instant.
Mafless tune is better wether stock or modified its way more responsive and just goes better.
I tune these so its not just because some other person said so its from experience.
The one issue is fueling is a lot harder to get right but if the tuner knows their ****
it wont be an issue.
People keep saying keep the maf on a stock engine but cant say exactly why.
Some tuners keep the maf as its just easier in comparison to re mapping the virtual ve table.
Then there are other fueling tables that come into play like PE and dynamics.
Maf is just easier for them.