Weld a space shuttle rocket booster to your roof, and hold on :bomb::bomb:
HoldenOn New Member Joined May 23, 2012 Messages 323 Reaction score 1 Points 0 Location Newcastle Members Ride 97 VS equip, 4.2L stroker on its way. May 28, 2012 #111 Weld a space shuttle rocket booster to your roof, and hold on :bomb::bomb:
D DavoVP New Member Joined Jul 25, 2008 Messages 697 Reaction score 6 Points 0 May 29, 2012 #112 chrrr said: Are you retarded? I cant even be bothered explaining just how stupid that is, so ill just laugh at your stupidity Click to expand... Are you ####ed in the head ? For about 6 grand old mate could have this ! A commodore with a 1jz in it. I would rather this over a turbo'd V6 buick any day. Last edited by a moderator: Nov 21, 2016
chrrr said: Are you retarded? I cant even be bothered explaining just how stupid that is, so ill just laugh at your stupidity Click to expand... Are you ####ed in the head ? For about 6 grand old mate could have this ! A commodore with a 1jz in it. I would rather this over a turbo'd V6 buick any day.
C Commotion New Member Joined Jan 7, 2006 Messages 53 Reaction score 0 Points 0 Age 37 Location beenleigh Members Ride 04 WRX May 30, 2012 #113 +1 for 1Jz, there are not all too many motors than can make 700rwhp unopened. However you can have a lot of fun with a turbocharged v6!! Vid of my old turbo v6 commodore...after i sold it http://youtu.be/vHkoR-mc630
+1 for 1Jz, there are not all too many motors than can make 700rwhp unopened. However you can have a lot of fun with a turbocharged v6!! Vid of my old turbo v6 commodore...after i sold it http://youtu.be/vHkoR-mc630
vsl67 Member Joined Dec 9, 2008 Messages 792 Reaction score 15 Points 18 Members Ride VS l67 statesman May 30, 2012 #114 As For the L67 versus Ecotec what about the fact the l67 is a stronger factory bottom end regardless of which supercharger you use and then for is a better starting point
As For the L67 versus Ecotec what about the fact the l67 is a stronger factory bottom end regardless of which supercharger you use and then for is a better starting point