Yes, I hear you. Absolutely right:
Cost of build vs opportunity (off track) to put the investment to use. Otherwise … what’s the point?
As I’m very keen for the turbo experience, I’m seeking out the middle ground between building enough to adequately and comfortably support one — and where a safe and reasonable cut-off point would be.
I am still ascertaining whether to build towards a turbo, or to focus on taking it as far as is reasonable — Naturally aspirated.
I figure if I do the latter (and not account for a turbo), I may find that were I later to add one, I’d end up with more modifications to do, as opposed to sort of ‘future proofing’ the engine, etc. for when the time comes to add a turbo.
As you stated, building a good NA engine is totally different to a boost build
To get any real power NA you will need alot of engine work, raise the compression, stroke, big grumpy cam, some good heads, big stall to suit the cam, and fuel solution
Or, if your engine is healthy, just bolt on chosen boost solution, drop in some good valve springs, and get your fuel solution sorted
Both have pros and cons
With both at the same power level, let's say 500hp, the NA will be a pig on the street, but with a good sized turbo a blown car will be responsive and not a issue on the street in traffic
My advice is to go to the drags and watch both the NA cars and boosted cars, that are running typical numbers, cruising around the staging lanes
Or better yet, go for a drive in a worked NA car, then go for a drive in one with boost, with a well matched turbo.....not one with a massive laggy turbo that needs to stage at 4k rpm to build boost
The only real advantage of a NA build is the legalities IRT visual modifications
If you don't have it engineered it can become problematic IRT registration and insurance