Skylarking
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2018
- Messages
- 10,241
- Reaction score
- 10,818
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 123
- Location
- Downunder
- Members Ride
- Commodore Motorsport Edition
yeah, I get what you are saying but EV is for driving and a home battery is for home life and the two are fundamentally contradictory. In any case, I’d expect that newer affordable EVs will come with smaller batteries which will pooch screw such strategies (other than emergencies home power during a rare distribution outage at a loss of driving untill charged).That’s fair enough.
I tend to run numbers on my household costs (yep, I have an excel spreadsheet!). I run scenarios from time to time planning out where my next bang-for-bucks spend lies. As part of that I run the idea of installing a battery. So far, I just haven’t been able to make the economics of a (house) battery work financially. It was close to borderline the last time I checked, but not ‘there’ economically. It might work environmentally, but I’m not flushed with money, so I try the spend carefully and wisely as possible.
So, briefly, my thinking has been along the following lines… I could go out and buy a PowerWall 2 for about $15,000 and it'll give me 13 kWh of storage. Much as you have pointed out, it would help, but it wouldn’t really run my household overnight if any major energy drains are happening (heating, cooling, cooking). However, If I purchased an EV at $60,000 and it has a 60 kWh battery (slightly better bangs-for-bucks kWh per $ than a Power Wall 2), I have four times the capacity - so 8 hours instead of ‘2 hours’), plus I have a car that can be used as a second car. Yes, I know it’s not exactly comparing apples with apples.
But look at it from a different angle. Perhaps my wife needs a new car (call it $25,000) and I was for some reason really wanting a PowerWall 2 (call it $15,000), then buying that $60,000 EV is only a $20,000 stretch above the cost of those two combined - and I get four times the storage. That amount of storage is getting in to the ‘run the house’ category if there is a power outage (which is rare). But more importantly, I have a usable second car that costs minimal to run, and a ‘house battery’ that has some serious usable capacity.
Regardless of the user economics, the planet saving strategies are not related to economics because govco fiddles with the numbers to push a strategy. Govco policies are the ones that have made it seem that “dirty” power generation is bad and pushed these plants to be shut down before their times which makes them so expensive as the companies try to squeeze as much out of their current infrastructure to pay for the write offs while building the new. All this make solar, wind, etc seem more cost effective… it’s like a shell game of sorts…
As is, I have trouble forgetting the environmental fuckwits that stops the Gordon-below-Franklin Dam project in Tasmania and now they want to turn off our power… Fcuk the greenies…
Regardless of what happens globally, we 25 million individuals are less than a stomach rumble compared to the bugger nations that are closer to the long fart of global warming (if I continue that analogy)… And as such we won’t solve a thing environmentally or economically…