Yeah and again the SS suffered from the nose heavy weight distribution when a Caprice based 4 door Chevy SS would have made sense as a replacement for the 4 door 94-96 Impala SS. Wildly better handling and braking and acceleration than the 94-96 SS and a LS Caprice would have had 50/50 WD.
The 94-96 SS had a 55/45 WD.
The VF II sedan was an almost perfect front to rear weight distribution of 50:50 while the VF II Ute was @ 53:47 .
Kerb weight varied with the SS @ 1745 kg (a bit porky to say the least).
So let’s assume a kerb weight of 1800 kg as it’s a nice round number. The 3% difference only amounts to 54kg… and though kerb weigh includes a full tank of fuel and all liquids, it doesn’t include a driver…
But here’s the kicker, the average male American weight in at 198 pounds or 89 kgs.
If one worries about ideal weight distribution to such an extent, maybe you should start a petition so it’s against police policy for their members to eat donuts. As their circumference reduces, vehicle performance would increase while foot chases would improvement exponentially as police chase the “purps” further faster, longer
Jokes aside, if one wants to pick faults, pick the big one which is that 1800 kg kerb weight as it blunts performance excessively as compared to a 3 service BMW which is some 200kgs lighter… That 54kg extra on the vehicles nose just gets lost in that fat
PS: the VE was a huge improvement over previous generation commodores (except for that fat A pillar which creates dangerous blind spots unless you peek around it like a bobble doll). And the VF was an improvement on the VE (though some say a few things went backwards).
The following is a good read on the VE.
From design to engineering and safety, this is everything you need to know about the development that went into the VE Commodore
www.whichcar.com.au