Even then, some might be put off organising it due to security issues. Such a gathering would be a prime target for an attack. Even more so than any western target.
Gees, you're good at firing bullets at others, but when asked for suggestions as to how the Muslim community might help to rectify the situation, this is the best you can do? It rings of the fear I and others have spoken of already in this thread; that is, the fear within the moderate, decent Muslim community, that the ratbag element might turn on them. So, are you saying that involving the decent Muslim community won't work? Sure sounds like it. You say that the manner of discussion on this thread indicates that the intention of terrorist is to frighten and terrorise has been achieved, then make a statement like the quote above. Recently, a large gathering of those decent people, including the father of the worst of the scum in Syria at present, gathered to confirm their abhorrence of IS and their appreciation for the life they can lead here. It was well covered in the media. It showed that a lot od decent Muslims are prepared to stand up and be counted, but they only represent a very, very small percentage of the 460,000+ Muslims now living in Australia. It was a good start, but needs to occur more and on a larger scale. The clerics who object or complain about discrimination and bullying of the Muslim community need to be told by these people that their views are wrong and out of sync with the mainstream thinking within that community.
I know you hate Tony Abbott, so perhaps you tuned out when his address to the UN was telecast earlier today, but he has said that the fight against Islamic extremists is not simply a case of the West fighting them - it's a case of ALL nations working together, including Muslim nations. The fact that five or six have already become part of the Coalition is very encouraging, unlike the impression you repeatedly convey which is "what can we/they do?" Sounds very weak and defeatist, to me, and I imagine to a number of others on this forum.
Earlier in this thread, you suggested that too much attention was being paid to this issue, and too little to domestic violence. As a former long term employee of a Police department, working alongside police in a very busy Command (which happened to have one of the largest populations in NSW, mainly Anglo-Saxon), I can recall that approximately 80% of general duty police work revolved around "domestics" - drunken husbands, wives, fights, arguments, etc. The police spent an enormous amount of time trying to deal with this issue, but because so much of it occurs within the confines of the home, there is no simple answer to the problem. NSW has conducted lengthy "It's unacceptable" campaigns, at considerable expense, for years. What has it achieved? Not nearly enough. It's too complex and involves too large a proportion of the population in many lower socio-economic areas. While domestic violence is a cancer within our society, it isn't the threat to our safety that IS and its "local representatives" have the potential to be.