Calaber
Nil Bastardo Carborundum
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 4,334
- Reaction score
- 1,357
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lower Hunter Region NSW
- Members Ride
- CG Captiva 5 Series 2
If I were Abbott, I wouldn't move one inch to help Gillard out of her present predicament, national interest or not. The immigrant fiasco is entirely of Labor's own making - it's almost impossible to believe that any government could dismantle a completely effective policy (from our national interest's perspective - not the immigrants' perspective), and nearly four years later, we still have no solution and the problem worsens every day. Anyone noticed that the "passenger loads" of these vessels is now upwards of 70 per time, whereas it was around 35-40 per trip. The smugglers have upped the ante and the refugees are coming in increasing numbers.
The Malaysion solution? Mixed feelings about that one. As a nation, we have a serious problem that needs an effective solution, and quickly. Our national image is being damaged and won't be enhanced by sending these people back to a country where they may be mistreated. We may or may not care what happens to them, but we have to seek a humane solution. Malaysia isn't such a solution. It is based on fear. As for the 5:1 (note to Reap - your maths suck) swap ratio, well, what a bargain. Must keep foreign governments amused at our sheer ineptitude.
Nauru was not such an inhumane place - it was based on the premise that you would be admitted there, temporarily protected, with no guarantee of entry to Australia, no access to our legal system and eventual placement at any suitable nation. There was no barbed wire enclosure as Labor claimed, the government of Nauru welcomed the scheme for the benefits to their economy (at our expense, of course) and the scheme was a sufficient deterrent to eventually see the boat trade cease. How could anybody consider that inappropriate, inhumane or ineffective? Obviously, Labor could. F***ing cretins.
The Malaysion solution? Mixed feelings about that one. As a nation, we have a serious problem that needs an effective solution, and quickly. Our national image is being damaged and won't be enhanced by sending these people back to a country where they may be mistreated. We may or may not care what happens to them, but we have to seek a humane solution. Malaysia isn't such a solution. It is based on fear. As for the 5:1 (note to Reap - your maths suck) swap ratio, well, what a bargain. Must keep foreign governments amused at our sheer ineptitude.
Nauru was not such an inhumane place - it was based on the premise that you would be admitted there, temporarily protected, with no guarantee of entry to Australia, no access to our legal system and eventual placement at any suitable nation. There was no barbed wire enclosure as Labor claimed, the government of Nauru welcomed the scheme for the benefits to their economy (at our expense, of course) and the scheme was a sufficient deterrent to eventually see the boat trade cease. How could anybody consider that inappropriate, inhumane or ineffective? Obviously, Labor could. F***ing cretins.