^ ? ^
Hmm. I think he's misquoted the name? Isn't it the MAF sensor that does the temp reading? That's just left of the first section of hose at the filter box. If not, I'd be interested to know what and where is being referred to. EDIT: He clarified; dyno side temp sensor.
So that nifty little pod filter returned 32L/100km eh? That is higher than an elderly Rolls Royce Silver Shadow (28.5L/100km)!
Even 11-12L/100 is not "normal" for a non-modded Alloytec. What have you fingered for it to arrive at this former figure?
Mods are fine if they don't bugger fuel economy (the majority provide more power at the expense of economy, obviously). Not being flush with cash, I watch my economy keenly; it's stable at 7.6L/100km unloaded (but over the long weekend on a 1,000km return drive with a heavy load (3 adults, 3 rucksacks and sundry piffle), the economy went to 8.6 to 8.9/100km — all on PULP).