vc commodore
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 10,853
- Reaction score
- 13,028
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Like the Leyland Brothers
- Members Ride
- VC, VH and VY
My understanding is that where the wheel can’t locate on the hub boss, a hub ring must be used to comply with current standards. As no hub ring was supplied with the wheel, it can correctly fit his vehicle, so it’s not fit for purpose (unless he was told a hub ring must be purchased at his cost prior to sale)…
Here’s one doc that discusses roadworthy requirements around hub wheel sloppiness:
It is certainly not good practice to fit a wheel which does not have a snug fit between the spigot hole and the wheel bearing hub or axle stub. This is supported by a requirement in the National Light Vehicle Modification Code of Practice (VSB14) which is called up in Victorian legislation that states “Replacement aluminium alloy rims must be located on the hub/axle by the same diameter centre spigot as the original wheel, using metal adaptor rings where necessary”.Therefore, if you encounter a situation where an aluminium alloy wheel does not fit snuggly on the central spigot, this is a cause for rejection in a roadworthiness test.
That was the first google hit but I’m sure other states have similar. But by all means substitute your view despite what is written.
As a side note, the fact that older vehicles were complied with older standards really isn’t relevant to later vehicles, otherwise I’d toss the cat converter and change the tune so I can get real throttle response on my 2017 commodore. But such would be rather illegal on my modern vehicle despite what is allowed on older pre ‘74 vehicles
Yes that would be interesting… Maybe the wheel wasn’t well centred and oscillated up and down a little, enough to be annoying, as he drove down the road?
Would be interested in how cars get approved with Romac axles then....