Yes, you provided some facts, but none of those facts or articles supported your conclusion that man is not responsible for climate change, you havent even attempted to link them.
Graphs, yes nice, and you have good computer skills in getting it to show. Unfortunately it is not evidence of what you want it to be:
This was pointed out to you by vr94ss:
http://forums.justcommodores.com.au...ng-climate-change-agw-thread.html#post1832240
and later on by myself:
http://forums.justcommodores.com.au...ng-climate-change-agw-thread.html#post1832297,
Perhaps if you put it all in Upper case Id be convinced :rofl2:
You are either so unbeleivable naive or so so very utterly stupid.
Facts, the earth goes through cycles, every 100,000 years or so.
Some links to evidence, not that it matters since apprently only evidence that backs your idea is right.
CO2 vs Temperature: Last 400,000 years
Ice age - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Global warming and cooling during the past 400,000 years/TITLE>
Temperature and CO2 concentration in the atmosphere over the past 400 000 years - Maps and Graphics at UNEP/GRID-Arendal
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/antarctica/vostok/deutnat.txt
3 things to note;
1. Even the site that is arguing FOR the arguement that man is causing global warming agree's that the earth goes through climate cycles.
2. Note the many references used on the sites as evidence for the evidence I am using.
3. Also notice that the timing of these cycles is quite consistant
Now, modern man has existed for about 150,000 years. This is also a fact, feel free to google it. Only way you can disagree with this is if you tell me that man has actually only existed 6,000 years since that is when god created man.
So broadly speaking, man has only existed since the last ice age until now, or, one climate cycle.
So we can safely say that man has not caused the cycles prior to this one due to being non existant. Wait, can I safely say that? I'm not sure, I should probably prove that casued the other cycles otherwise it has to have been man even though we didn't exist as a species yet.
So how can you argue that man is causing climate change now when they couldn't possibly have caused the previous cycles AND this cycle matches the timeframes of previous cycles?
Climate change is real, clearly, but man is not the cause.