Skylarking
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2018
- Messages
- 10,147
- Reaction score
- 10,641
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 123
- Location
- Downunder
- Members Ride
- Commodore Motorsport Edition
From a factory or ACL warranty perspective, the lack of fluid change can't be an issue in any way if you follow the service schedule. After all, if the service interval for fluid change has not yet arrived (be it the normal or severe schedule*) then the fluid should be OK according to the manufacturer. So then how can a manufacturer or seller** blame you for the failure because you followed their service schedule? It's laughable... I reckon it does have to do with a lack of fluid changing because the OP said it was never changed and the tranny needs lubrication, like the engine...
If one didn't follow the service schedule then that's a different issue. Interestingly the dealer is trying to claim such tripe because the owner used a "zooper" service which is sold as being identical to a logbook servce. Such marketing opens up other ACL issues around deceptive practice by those that sold the zooper service and the dealer that provided the service only later to claim it was a zooper service and not a fixed price factory service...
The reality may be that the sevice schedule is indeed insufficient but that will result in lots of failures and lots of warranty costs. However that's not the fault of the buyer that a manufacturer wanted a nice cheap to maintain (on paper) product that their dealers can sell. Unfortunately what they sell falls short of the ACL durability standards that buyers and the market expect.
Whichever way you look at it, it's a clusterfuck and will cost the seller or manufacture to put this right. Unfortuanetly the owner will have to fight for their rights under law.
Really, we all need to be more critical in our thinking and not accept the bullshite "not covered under warranty because..." crap the sellers and manufacturers often trot out
* I've never had a dealer service manager tell me i need to use the severe service schedule. They are my local dealer and see the vehicle every service, they see the kms driven, the weather conditions in the area and also experience the local traffic where it's driven. They never enquire whether I tow, idle for hours or other such stuff that may impact the service schedule that should be used. Yet the law sees than as the experts, so presumably they service the vehicle correctly. Why then would I later accept that I didn't follow their severe service schedule crap if the servie dealer never mentioned anyting (being the experts). Eitehr it's crap or they are negligent in law, they can choose how to handle it
** I've had one dealer trot out the crap about needing fibres within my transmission oil when enquiring about transmission service schedule. He was trying to convince me the trans doesn't need a fluid flush and that I may be left stranded (excuse the pun) if I flush the old transmission fluid... in a car that has travelled 100,000 kms (so not flogged to near death)... These service experts really need to listen to themselves and understand the planned obsolescence they are preaching....