And some of the people who are teaching their kids/grand kids got their licence driving a cop up and down the main street. Oddly enough they seem to be the ones that generally have the loudest voice when it comes to saying more hours, etc.
To me the education side of it needs to focus more on defensive driving, learning how to control your car in adverse conditions, not driving up and down a highway for 120odd hours.
Thing is apparently car control courses do zip to improve one's safety, because they increase one's confidence to match the new skills one acquires. Pros of car control - i.e. racing drivers - apparently have a much higher crash rate with the rest of the population.
That isn't to say all post-licence training is for nought. The UK Institute of Advanced Motorists members have been shown to have a far lower crash risk, via implementing the System of Car Control. In the UK this is a charity overseen by govt and police. It is a bit anal though. Not 'supposed' to brake and change gear at the same time apparently, for example.
The Graduated licence system I feel is a step in the right direction; in addition the P test is now far, far more rigouous than in years past. But the question is - is it an 'authentic' assessment? A 'hoon' for lack of better word can summon up the patience to jump through the hoops, do the right thing, and get their P's. At which point they are unleashed on the roads and go nuts. Here, highway patrol presence, and tough punishment for extreme, deliberate speeders are what is required, along with car confiscation or even prison/fine/bonds for very severe or prolonged repeat offenders.