wetwork65
A wet business
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2006
- Messages
- 1,379
- Reaction score
- 2,072
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Sydney
- Members Ride
- VF SSV Wagon & VF SV6 Wagon
Dunlop? I got burnt years ago with a set of Direzzas. They didn't wear at all, because they simply had no grip. No grip in dry or wet.You get those blokes and plenty like that at the race track. It's astounding the amount of racers outside the top 10 will argue their setup and equipment is better than the front runners despite blowing them into the next postcode!
We had a few Falcon's, BA, BF and FG with Dunlop's and not only were they crap tyres in general, they were as dear as poison too if you wanted an OEM replacement. Noisy, crap in the dry and like ice skates in the wet!
Kumho changed the V8 Touring Car slick a few times with delamination and blowing tyres issues and in 2015 we ran a set of Supercar Dunlop's at Mallala in Sports Sedan races. We ended up frying the rear tyres and put a set of Kumho's on for the last race and the car was a second faster with much better traction out of corners than the Dunlop's. With the setup we had on the car, the Kumho's were better everywhere. In the end, Kumho got the Supercar slick working pretty well and was much cheaper than a Dunlop. I think the 3rd tier Supercars are on Dunlop's now racing at the main game meetings. We've got an old VZ Supercar with 17's 280/680 tyre size.
I should have realised how bad Dunlops were in the rental Falcons I had - I blamed the cars - it was the tyres, which were "Sport" maxx or more correctly Death maxx.
Looking on their website, the patterns have been around for a long time.
As I've said before - Aquajets in their time were a revelation (1970s), if run at 24 psi, but since then, nada.
I have used RE003s since 2015, on 4 cars now, they work well for me and the price/performance ratio on my cars is agreeable.