Not_An_Abba_Fan
Exhaust Guru
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2006
- Messages
- 14,639
- Reaction score
- 1,364
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Bunbury, WA
- Members Ride
- Strange Rover
I was only using 27% as an example because that is what Pirate had. And I was working it backwards using 27% as the figure to be ADDED to RWKW as a drive train loss. I wasn't quoting actual losses or gains, just using 27% of 190. If you use 70kW, then it's closer to 37% of 190.
If you had a 70kW power loss through the drivetrain on a standard engine, then you would still have a 70kW loss no matter what you did to the engine, that is how many kW it takes to overcome drive train inertia. So 70kW added to 190 gives you a starting figure of 260FWKW, if you now have 230RWKW, + 70, gives you 310FWKW. Example only using 70kW though. Even if you went from 190RWKW NA and turbo'd it up to 800RWKW you would still have 70kW as your drive train loss.
I don't have any dyno sheets myself, but I may be able to find one.
If you had a 70kW power loss through the drivetrain on a standard engine, then you would still have a 70kW loss no matter what you did to the engine, that is how many kW it takes to overcome drive train inertia. So 70kW added to 190 gives you a starting figure of 260FWKW, if you now have 230RWKW, + 70, gives you 310FWKW. Example only using 70kW though. Even if you went from 190RWKW NA and turbo'd it up to 800RWKW you would still have 70kW as your drive train loss.
I don't have any dyno sheets myself, but I may be able to find one.