Yes it does.
How is post #11 appropriate when you've removed the comments that you feel justifies that post (rhetorical)?
Really, it's your prerogative to remove posts but that logic you've just stated for keeping post #11 is a fail
I'll leave it at that
As for my earlier removed comment, i'll repeat it again for
@Avarice 's benefit.
Under Australian Consumer Law, service must be provided with due care and skill. And if there were issues with squeaking eminating from the upper part of the engine and you brought that to the attention of the mechanic that provided your service, then the mechanic should have checked more thoroughly (due to the known lifter issues and related weaknesses in these engines). Had he done so, may be such a failure could have been avoided or minimised. Making appropriate checks (or advising teh client that some further checks are required) is providing service with due care and skill
So if you feel that was not the case and service was provided with less than due care and skill, best call Consumer Affairs Victoria and speek some advice on what action you can take. Why, because engine builds aren't cheap and recouping the rebuild cost can be a nice bonus... It can be an uphill battle dealing with ACL issues but you've got a potential 10K to 20K bill to fix the shite that may have been caused by someone elses mistake