I've always said this ... and if I totalled what I wanted & could have been able to pay repayment-for vs what I actually bought over the years, I've probably saved myself at least a coupla hundred grand ...
But at mid 40's neither I nor my better-half had ever bought a new car, the newest either of us had bought was a couple of years old - and that was in the early 90's for both of us. And as a car enthusiast I'd never owned an Australian V8 car, which (like owning an Alfa) is something I felt needed rectifying, despite the fact that I'd probably regret it (like owning an Alfa) because we all know Holdens are cheap+nasty (the reliable comfy 20yo one that the VF was replacing notwithstanding
).
Would I have bought a VE? I dunno. The interior was always very taxi-spec to me, but without the VF to compare I mightn't have been so against the concept. But we were always going to buy new, so the question never really came up.
I ... well I almost regret not waiting for a VF2. But I wouldn't have got the colour
we both wanted (it's NLA in Redline), and it'd have cost nearly an extra $10k. Yes our car's depreciated AT LEAST $10k since we picked it up a bit over 5 months ago, but if you own a car 20 years like we intend to it's the purchase-price that's the biggie - resale notsomuch.