Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.

New Posts Contact us

Just Commodores Forum Community

It takes just a moment to join our fantastic community

Register

Is 100,000kms too high for buying second hand?

Skylarking

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
10,159
Reaction score
10,682
Points
113
Age
123
Location
Downunder
Members Ride
Commodore Motorsport Edition
... my point was people seem to burn through so much cash these days just buying things and throwing them out a couple of years later.
Welcome to the world of environmentally conscious consumers, an oxymoron if there ever was one :rolleyes:
 

panhead

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
3,162
Reaction score
4,519
Points
113
Location
NSW Central Coast
Members Ride
Cars

panhead

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
3,162
Reaction score
4,519
Points
113
Location
NSW Central Coast
Members Ride
Cars
Welcome to the world of environmentally conscious consumers, an oxymoron if there ever was one :rolleyes:


I don't consider myself to be 'oxy'.







.
 

chrisp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
1,893
Reaction score
5,128
Points
113
Location
Melbourne Victoria
Members Ride
VF2 MY16 SS Redline Sportwagon
Does anybody buy a 100k car now? Surely they are all leases.

IMHO (novated) leasing has to be one of the greatest rip-offs going. Yep, the leasee certainly ‘saves’ tax but ends up paying the equivalent to the lease company as ‘rent’ for the vehicle. And on top of that the leasee wears all the risk with the transaction. Lost, or changed, your job - you pay, car worth less than the residual - you pay, car scratched, modified or damaged - you pay.

I got quotes in leasing a car and it worked out cheaper to borrow the money than lease - and came without the risks associated with leasing. After about three years I’d fully own it (whereas with a lease the lease company would still own it).

I’d certainly recommend anyone who is considering a lease to carefully check the numbers and don’t be hoodwinked by the claimed ‘tax savings’ and you really need to work out your total spend (including any tax benefits and leasing costs).
 

J_D 2.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2020
Messages
2,979
Reaction score
7,036
Points
113
Location
Ipswich
Members Ride
2009 VE SSV M6 on LPG and 2022 Kawasaki Z650L
IMHO (novated) leasing has to be one of the greatest rip-offs going. Yep, the leasee certainly ‘saves’ tax but ends up paying the equivalent to the lease company as ‘rent’ for the vehicle. And on top of that the leasee wears all the risk with the transaction. Lost, or changed, your job - you pay, car worth less than the residual - you pay, car scratched, modified or damaged - you pay.

I got quotes in leasing a car and it worked out cheaper to borrow the money than lease - and came without the risks associated with leasing. After about three years I’d fully own it (whereas with a lease the lease company would still own it).

I’d certainly recommend anyone who is considering a lease to carefully check the numbers and don’t be hoodwinked by the claimed ‘tax savings’ and you really need to work out your total spend (including any tax benefits and leasing costs).
Bingo! Novated leasing doesn’t stack up at all. I came to the same conclusion as you when I looked into it. All your doing is taking tax money away from the government and giving it to the leasing company. It doesn’t save you money at all.
 

VS 5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
8,020
Reaction score
14,408
Points
113
Location
Perth WA
Members Ride
VE SSV Z Series M6
IMHO (novated) leasing has to be one of the greatest rip-offs going. Yep, the leasee certainly ‘saves’ tax but ends up paying the equivalent to the lease company as ‘rent’ for the vehicle. And on top of that the leasee wears all the risk with the transaction. Lost, or changed, your job - you pay, car worth less than the residual - you pay, car scratched, modified or damaged - you pay.

I got quotes in leasing a car and it worked out cheaper to borrow the money than lease - and came without the risks associated with leasing. After about three years I’d fully own it (whereas with a lease the lease company would still own it).

I’d certainly recommend anyone who is considering a lease to carefully check the numbers and don’t be hoodwinked by the claimed ‘tax savings’ and you really need to work out your total spend (including any tax benefits and leasing costs).

There is a reason the novated leasing industry was up in arms a couple of years ago when there was a push to change the treatment of these arrangements.....and they weren't defending the benefits to their customers.
 

Skylarking

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
10,159
Reaction score
10,682
Points
113
Age
123
Location
Downunder
Members Ride
Commodore Motorsport Edition
All your doing is taking tax money away from the government and giving it to the leasing company. It doesn’t save you money at all.
The benifit of leasing depends on an individuals circumstances and desires. The bottom line depend on vehicle cost, salary, how many kms they do each year and how many years they lease for. What they get and what it costs defines whether its a goer....

If you are paid $ 1/4 mil a year and lease the cheapest Ferrari @ $399,988 for 2 years, you'll only see a $1500-$ 1600 monthly impact. That's less than $40k to drive a $400k Ferrari for two years... Some may consider that great value...


As always money is king... and as Mel brooks said, its good to be king :p

Sadly, the rip off is to the public purse which carries the cost of such extravagance which, now that manufacture is dead, can only benifit the vehicle importers.

For the curious, see this novated lease calculator and play with the prospects of being very well paid...


Edited: in my haste i thought the salary impact was monthly but it's weekly (so the said Ferrari will cost about $170K over the two years of the lease... (and some may still think that's ok...)
 
Last edited:

Anthony121

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
2,183
Reaction score
1,372
Points
113
Location
Melbourne
Members Ride
VF SSV Redline MY17 & VF Director
The benifit of leasing depends on an individuals circumstances and desires. The bottom line depend on vehicle cost, salary, how many kms they do each year and how many years they lease for. What they get and what it costs defines whether its a goer....

If you are paid $ 1/4 mil a year and lease the cheapest Ferrari @ $399,988 for 2 years, you'll only see a $1500-$ 1600 monthly impact. That's less than $40k to drive a $400k Ferrari for two years... Some may consider that great value...

As always money is king... and as Mel brooks said, its good to be king :p

Sadly, the rip off is to the public purse which carries the cost of such extravagance which, now that manufacture is dead, can only benifit the vehicle importers.

For the curious, see this novated lease calculator and play with the prospects of being very well paid...

[/URL]
The calc doesn't actually say how much to put into the lease.
 
Top