Forg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2015
- Messages
- 6,532
- Reaction score
- 4,637
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Sydney
- Members Ride
- Regal Peackock VF SS-V Redline Wagoon
Just with respect to this ... we don't have the same ashpalt, you read a lot about how cars first driven in Japan or Europe have different NVH characteristics here for example.I wouldn't have thought so, we make roads just the same way they do. We use the same formula to mix and lay the asphalt, so why would they change them?
And don't countries where it gets properly cold use more concrete, because it lasts longer & copes a bit better with freezing?
Although my gut-feel belief, regarding differences in tyres with the same model-name, is that I think it's more likely to be due to cost-cutting where they think they can get away with it.
The ones I've read in Australian magazines using Australian products have usually been run by the magazine, with tyres usually provided by one or more of the multi-brand chains (eg. Jax).To be honest I'm always suspicious of any tyre test. They are always hosted by one of the biggies, which it needs to be to get the facilities for wet weather testing. Somehow the host company always does well... funny that. Bias, sponsorship, or just a tyre that is good at that track, as it was developed there??
My problem with them has more been the fact that tyres seem to perform differently, relatively, in different sizes & as fitted to different cars. So Tyre A might be better than Tyre B as tested on a VF SS, but that doesn't mean B wouldn't perform better than A if I fit them to my 40yo Volvo.
Last edited: