Skylarking
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2018
- Messages
- 10,130
- Reaction score
- 10,591
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 123
- Location
- Downunder
- Members Ride
- Commodore Motorsport Edition
From the photos, it looks like he hit the rear tray of some tall 4x4 ute at an angle where most of the force would have been taken by the bonnet and the radiators and radiator support panel. The visible damage looks to only be the bonnet, front bar (& its bits) along with the right headlight. There also seems a little bending in the front of the fenders around the headlights with the left side looking worse, so i wouldn't say the fenders are fecked. Oddly the left headlamp looks ok...Looks like both front guards are fecked as well.
So the visible damage actually looks simple but the real interesting bit is what parts that aren't visible have been damaged and why did the insurance assessor wrote the car off?
The problem with modern cars is that everything within the crumple zone is structural in one sense and one doesn't really know what's bent until the cars front is dismantled... There may be an element of over cautiousness from the insurance assessor through experience but it's always worth questioning.
Having said that, I'm with FU in that bits from a white front clip will see this repaired in short order while avoiding paint.. again as long as there is nothing structural going on that is...
So I'm iterested and curious to see more pics