Amazing how this topic crops up every so often. Makes my job easier as all I have to do is copy and past what I written over the years
Yes our rockers are based of the factory items, which are a roller rocker as they do run a rolling element bearing in the trunnion/pivot. We don't make the rules in this regard and it’s the reason why they are classed as a roller rocker as there is a rolling element bearing in which the rocker "rocker's" about. For arguments sake, if the rocker ran a plain bearing in the trunnion/pivot but a roller tip on the end, it could still technically not be classed as a roller rocker, as the location of the roller bearing is not causing rocking
Case in point crane cam rocker arm in the link below, which runs a roller tip but a plain bearing
Crane Cams Rocker Arms - Circle Track Magazine
An EXCELLENT competition rocker BUT can it be classed as a roller rocker? Reading the article makes no mention that it is, I’m guessing because of the bearing style it’s running in the trunnion…
So people may argue here that it is or it isn’t a roller rocker, the fact that it uses a rolling element bearing on the tip to “reduce” friction I can understand why people would. I’ve fallen in to this school of though of late I mean lets face a roller bearing in a rocker arm gives you a roller rockers whether it’s a “true” roller rocker or not.
In all fairness what is a “true” rocker arm anyway? I mean 99.99% of the roller rockers on the market are still relying on effectively a plain bearing between the pushrod and pushrod cup? Yes, depending on the rocker arm design a bearing can be put on the end of a push rod cup to make it a “true” roller bearing, it’s just too hard…
Anyhoo we’ve never hidden the fact they they’re not roller tipped items, as can be clearly seen by our adverting pics and the feedback I’ve personally given over the years on numerous forums and emails etc.
As for the purpose of not having having a roller tipped rocker, two main reasons,
- they reduce the amount of un sprung mass the valve spring has to control given the reduced valve tip weight reducing chances of valve float. Meaning valve springs are less likely to be changed to control increased mass/inertia. In bolt on applications where people are looking at ease of installation this is a big plus.
- The effective ratio of a non roller tipped item increases while a roller tipped item decreases. Basically you get more lift out of a non roller tipped rocker then you would a roller tipped one based on the same static ratio, meaning more power per given static ratio. In bolt on applications where people are looking for power this is perfect.
Don’t get me wrong I have no problem with recommending roller tipped rockers in builds that run highly aggressive cams or very stiff springs as the serve a valuable purpose in certain applications. However to believe that roller tipped rockers are the messiah when it comes to saving guides or valve train stability on ecotecs I can’t hugely agree, two main reason why
Firstly the geometry of the fixed tipped ecotec rocker has more of a tendency to rock over the top of the valve stem then to drag like earlier rocker designs meaning that the force component perpendicular to the side of the valve steam is very minimal. Long story short there is less of a bending moment put on the valve stem reducing both friction forces at the top and radial loading on the valve guide of the bat. Sure rolled tipped rockers have less in this regard but…
The second reason is that the force distributed across the valve retainer, which contact the valve spring, induces a bending moment regardless of rocker type radial loading of the guides as can be seen from the valve stem bouncing around from side to side, even with a roller tipped rocker, from the link below.
YouTube - Short Valve Float Movie
Given by how much the valve stem deflects from side to side this force is definitely not an insignificant one!
The way to reduce this component though would be to keep the top of the guide as close as possible to the retainer, conical type valve spring with the smallest mirror diameter as possible accompanied by appropriate retainers.
Hope this clears a few things up for people
Cheers,
Steve