Honestly, GM got it right with the Colorado, you have to hand it to them. The Tacoma that is build in the US is a shite-box. Is outdated and has not even close to the towing capacity, also, has a crappy ride, crap interiors and carry a higher price and questionable quality. Toyota quality is overrated, all boils down to how well you take care of the vehicle. Our Colorado has the V6 LFX high feature that is found on many GM high performance cars. Is not an oil burner like someone posted before, 45,000+ miles and going strong. Granted, not a proper truck engine, the power comes up on the high side about 3 grands one the Tach. Anyway, took the truck to Colorado, at 13,000 Ft and I was pulling our 3860 Lbs caravan at 45 MPH and able to hit 55 MPH any time easy. Transmission temps on the 160 F all at 9 MPG up the hill. Not bad for a V6 and a small size truck, it will put any Tacoma/Hilux to shame. The G80 Eaton Locker did superb on Ice/Snow, no need for 4WD or Snow Chains. The Turbo Diesel 2.6 Duramax (Mini-Max) has 7,600 Lbs on towing with $4,500 premium price. I can say, is a good value for what it is with 4 doors.
Anyway, back on the ZB thread. The the ZB platform is a crap box if you expect to get the performance of the VE or VF. I have to say, Holden "Knock it out of the Ballpark" with the VE and VF.
In my opinion, the best looking from all the Commodores is the VE, has all the right proportions, best design flow. The VF, to me is a mechanical revised version with some a-la-chevy-bland looks, but still a good design.